THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF CAUSALITY IN TOXIC TORT CASES

---

From: A.A. Marino & L.E. Marino: The Scientific Basis of Causality in Toxic Tort Cases, Dayton Law Review, vol. 21, pp. 1-62, 1995.

CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION

II. CAUSALITY IN SCIENCE

A. Generalization in Science: From Caused to Can Cause

B. Can 't Cause in Science

III. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE EXPERT IN TOXIC TORTS

A. Casuality

B. Non-Causal Knowledge

C. Scientific and Medical Experts Distinguished

IV. VALIDITY OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE

A. Intrinsic Validity

B. Extrinsic Validity

C. Reliance on the Work Product of Blue-Ribbon Committees

V. APPLICATION OF SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN TOXIC TORT CASES

A. Principal Inductive Opinion

B. Exposure to the Toxic Agent

C. Principal Deductive Opinion

VI. ADMISSIBILITY OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IN TOXIC TORT CASES

A. Modern American Jurisprudence Regarding Reliability of Expert Testimony: Frye to Daubert

B. The Hearsay Rule

VII. EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC REASONING BY THE TRIER OF FACT

A. The Expert's Choice of Method and Data

B. Principal Inductive Opinion

C. Principal Deductive Opinion

VIII. DOE V. BLUE: A HYPOTHETICAL TOXIC TORT CASE

IX. CONCLUSION

X. GLOSSARY

XI. APPENDIX: The Logical Structure of Scientific Studies Relevant to Toxic Tort Cases

XII. FOOTNOTES

Return to top of page

 Marino Home Page | Research Interests

35517